Sunday, May 17, 2020

Justice And Injustice Of Plato s The Republic - 1502 Words

Short Essay: Justice and Injustice in Plato’s The Republic In Plato’s The Republic, Socrates expresses his belief that in order for a state and its people to be functioning at their best, every citizen ought to do what they have the most character for, or what they are most qualified to do. Whether it is craftsmanship, guarding the city, playing music, or healing the sick, Socrates thinks that everyone should make his or her living doing one thing that they are skilled at, and one thing only. In order to ensure that only the best guardians are guarding the state, and only the most fit to rule become rulers, and so on, Socrates proposes the myth of the metals. He says to Glaucon that such an â€Å"audacious fiction† is necessary to convince the people that their livelihoods are beyond their choice and out of their control. The myth of the metals contains various invented truths, the first being that the state does not educate or train any citizen in their youth; instead, it is the earth that cultivates each person’s chara cteristics and skills. In this way, everyone has different inherent talents that are specially selected by God. God mingles gold into those who have the power to command others and who have claim to the greatest honor in society. He makes others with silver, which He deems best fit to guard the city as auxillaries, or soldiers. And finally, He composes the craftsmen, farmers, and other common citizens with brass and iron. God commands the rulers of the state toShow MoreRelatedCivility644 Words   |  3 Pagesi.e. optimism for the betterment of society. Plato in The Republic speaks about the ideal virtues of the soul and Davetian goes on to tell us the current problems with American civility. I think what we can take from both readings is a sense that human intellect and virtue can and will ultimately lead us to a better society. To fully understand the basic concepts of societal values that should be understood, and in turn followed, The Republic (Plato, Reprinted 1985) is an important piece of literatureRead MoreIdeal State1366 Words   |  6 PagesTuÄŸÃ §e ArÄ ±kan Essay Question: Explain Plato’s ideal state by referring to the Republic, book IV and VII. To what extent do you agree with Plato’s idea that the kings should be philosophers? Why? Why not? Concept of create an ideal state really need to long effort and time. This concept and long standing debate that how should be an ideal state is explains in Plato’s Republic book IV and VII. In Republic, Plato explains the features of an ideal state and he claims that the kings should be philosophersRead MoreThomas Hobbes And Plato s The Leviathan And The Republic1496 Words   |  6 Pagesespecially true for the term â€Å"justice†. The philosophers Hobbes and Plato both exhibit their own beliefs towards its interpretation through their respective stories, the Leviathan and the Republic. Instead of simply stating his view, Plato takes it to another level. He brings up a multitude of possibilities for the meaning of justice, arguing with himself and shooting down his own theories. The purpose of his Republic is to find the best and most logical definition of justice through discussion. HobbesRead MoreSocrates Argument Of The Just And Unjust. Plato s Republic Essay898 Words   |  4 PagesABSTRACT. This paper seeks to reject Socrates arguments against Thrasymachus account of the just and unjust in Plato s Republic, and, in doing so, show that Thrasymachus account is in fact a coherent and plausible account of justice. I begin by describing the context of Socrates and Thrasymachus argument and what it would take for Socrates to overcome the Thrasymachian account. I then describe the Thrasymachian account and argue for its coherence. I attack the Socratic method of deconstructingRead MoreTime Of Tutorial : Over Reliance On Fictions Made Socrates1559 Words   |  7 Pagesconsidered important in our human nature and reality. A special case is his idea and understanding of justice. Unlike many thinkers of his time, Socrates claimed that justice is making sure that people get all and only what they deserve. According to him, Justice is the act of minding one’s own business (Plato, 433b). He argued that all human actions are driven by self-interest which is the main cause of injustice in the society. In order to distinguish what is just and unjust, Socrates had to use many storiesRead More Democracy: Justices, Injustices, and Socratic Arguments to Improve Current Democratic Politics1815 Words   |  8 Pages In the Republic, Plato seeks to define justice and, through definition, show that justice is intrinsically worthwhile. In doing so, Plato sets out to explain the principal concept of political justice, and from this obtain a parallel model of individual justice. Essentially, justice is defined as a result of accurate logic or reasoning. However, it is quite important to note that the democratic regime discussed in the Republic is not the same as the known democratic regime of today. The democraticRead MoreCritism in Plato2608 Words   |  11 Pagesthis question. As his position takes form in the Republic, Plato claims that only a very few individuals are capable of understanding how human life is to be lived. If it could be done, the rest of us would be best off it we were to let out lives be controlled by such individuals. This position held by Plato has been one of much discussion and disagreement over the years. In this paper I will attempt to give my own insight and stand on Plato s position and will evaluate his position as it emergesRead MoreJustice Is The Interest Of The Stronger1453 Words   |  6 PagesI am of the opinion that justice is indeed in the interest of the stronger; the stronger being the will of the people. Justice is in the interest of the stronger. This view, first articulated by the Ancient Greek Sophist Thrasymachus, is the subject of much debate in one of Plato’s works The Republic, found in a fictional dialogue between Thrasymachus and Socrates. In order to understand the nature of this statement it is essential to analyse the nature of justice, what is meant by â€Å"the stronger†Read MoreAristotle s Ethics And Plato s The Republic892 Words   |  4 Pagesteachings about multiple things such as justice, Gods, and philosophy. In my paper, I am going to discuss the concepts of Aristotle s Ethics and Plato s The Republic in order to hopefully achieve whether or not the ideas that have stuck out to me, are true or not. In the book Ethics, by Aristotle, plenty of concepts have stuck out to me, and made me think quite a bit. One of the ideas that stick out to me is, an agent is only responsible for acts of injustice performed voluntarily. And, when it isRead MoreMachiavelli Plato Rebuplic Prince Comparison1419 Words   |  6 PagesHaà ¾im Cihan Demirkà ¶prà ¼là ¼, 20303433 Essay Question: Compare the Characteristics of the true guardians, as described by Plato (Republic, bk VII, pp.158 #8211; 61, 484b #8211; 487e) with the characteristics of the rulers, as described by Machiavelli (The Prince, ch.15, pp. 47 #8211; 49 and ch. 18, pp.54f). What is the most important difference between the two accounts? In your view, which account is better, and why? For centuries, every ruler created their own principles and rules and somehow

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Genetic Mutation And Genetic Mutations - 1079 Words

A genetic mutation occurs after the formation of the DNA sequence has been altered (Reference, 2016). Some mutations are easily noticed; others are well hidden. Depending on which mutation the individual has depends on how severe or obvious the mutation is. There are several different mutations an individual can have, and some individuals may have more than one. Although mutations can be harmless, they can still be a hindrance to the individual who has it. Different mutations are caused by different defects. Some mutations are caused by missing chromosomes, others are caused by a duplicated, or even substituted chromosomes (Wikipedia, 2016). But mutations do serve a purpose. Some add beauty, others add defenses. Nevertheless, mutations do†¦show more content†¦Either way, the mutation is there, even if you can’t see it. Mutations can be sorted into four groups; Substitutions, Insertions, Duplications, and Deletions. Each of these categories create a different set of m utations. Depending on the category depends on the mutation. Some of the broader categories can be split into subcategories (Wikipedia, 2016). For example, Substitutions has three subcategories: Silent Mutations, Nonsense Mutations, and Missense Mutations. These mutations add, stop, and decrease the amount of amino acid that is used in a gene (Wikipedia, 2016). Like Insertions, Deletions has sub categories as well: Interstitial Deletions, Chromosomal Inversions, Chromosomal Translocations, and Loss of Heterozygosity. These mutations delete parts of the DNA, reverse the orientation of the chromosomal segment, interchange areas of non-homologous chromosomes, and/or cause the DNA to lose an allele (Wikipedia, 2016). Insertions happen when one or more extra nucleotides, or a â€Å"base pairs†, are inserted into the DNA (Evolution.berkeley.edu, 2016). Partnering with the Frameshift Mutation, Insertions can alter the amino acid in the DNA strands. The e xtra acid may affect the function of the proteins in the cell (Wikipedia, 2016). Duplications also has subcategories: Retrotransposition, Ectopic Recombination, Aneuploidy, Whole

Economics for Price Discrimination and Dumping - myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theEconomics for Price Discrimination and Dumping. Answer: Introduction In the domestic as well as in the international market the producers and the sellers often engage in several economic activities in order to maximize their revenues and sales. One such activity is the activity of price discrimination and the other one is that of dumping. Price Discrimination and Dumping Price Discrimination- The price discrimination is one of the pricing strategies of the sellers with the help of which the sellers charge different prices from different people for the same commodity or service. For a seller to discriminate prices for the same product the markets should be differentiated geographically, by distance or by time and there should be no overlapping of market. This is required to stop arbitrage, that is the phenomenon in which one can buy the commodity from a market with lower price and sell in another market at a higher price. Price discrimination is done mainly in order to charge the consumers according to their purchasing power and willingness to buy, thereby increasing the revenue of the seller (Cantono and Marchionatti 2012). Dumping-A type of predatory pricing strategy which the seller undertakes, specifically in the context of international trade, in which a seller sells a product at a lower price in the international market than the amount that the seller charges in the domestic economy. This is done by the seller in order to capture a greater share of the international market so as to increase his or her revenue and for the purpose of dumping, the sellers often keep the international prices lower than their cost of production (Black, Hashimzade and Myles 2012). Difference between price discrimination and dumping Though the two phenomena, price discrimination and dumping apparently looks like the same and dumping may look like a special case of price differentiation only, however, there are differences between the two. Price discrimination is mainly done in order to reap the highest possible profit the sales by selling at higher prices to those with lesser elasticity of demand and at lower prices to those with higher elasticity of demand. On the other hand, dumping is a pricing strategy which the sellers undertake in order to increase their international market share, which may increase their long term revenue and prospects (Kerr and Perdikis 2014). Similarity between price discrimination and dumping Price discrimination and dumping may appear to be the same when the seller sets the price lower in the foreign country than in the domestic currency and when it is not clear whether the seller is selling at a price below its cost of production in the international market. On the other hand, if the cost of production of the seller is known and the prices charged by the sellers, both in the domestic as well as in the international market are higher than the cost of production, then it may be asserted that the seller is resorting to price discrimination and not dumping. The two phenomena can also be differentiated when the price charged by the seller in the domestic market is lesser than what he or she charges in the international market (Cowan 2012). References Black, J., Hashimzade, N. and Myles, G. eds., 2012.A dictionary of economics. OUP Oxford. Cantono, S. and Marchionatti, R., 2012. Dumping as price discrimination: Jannaccones classic theory before Viner.Journal of the History of Economic Thought,34(2), pp.193-218. Cowan, S., 2012. Third?Degree Price Discrimination and Consumer Surplus.The Journal of Industrial Economics,60(2), pp.333-345. Kerr, W. and Perdikis, N., 2014.A Guide to the Global Business Environment: The Economics of International Commerce. Edward Elgar Publishing.